The Home Page
NEW!
Introduction
Site Search
For Students
Veterans Roll Call
Speakers List
In Memory
Photo Album
History & Timeline
Freedom Movement
Documents
Letters From the Field
Our Stories
Our Thoughts
Your Thoughts
Discussions
Poetry
Web Links
Bibliography
Frequent Questions
Blog
Announcements
Nonviolence
Release Form
Archive
About Us
Sitemap
Privacy & Copyright
|
The Meaning of Birmingham
by Bayard Rustin
Originally published Liberation, June
1963
Since the signing of the Emancipation proclamation in 1863, the struggle
for justice by Afro-Americans has been carried out by many dedicated
individuals and militant organizations. Their ultimate aim, sometimes
stated, often not, has always been total freedom. Many forms of strategy
and tactics have been used. Many partial victories have been won. Yet
the gradual and token "progress" that many white liberals pointed to
with pride served only to anger the black man and further frustrate him.
That frustration has now given way to an open and publicly declared war
on segregation and racial discrimination throughout the nation. The aim
is simple. It is directed at all white Americans — the
President of the United States, his brother, Robert, the trade-union
movement, the power elite, and every living white soul the Negro meets.
The war cry is "unconditional surrender — end all Jim
Crow now." Not next week, not tomorrow — but now.
This is not to say that many have not felt this way for decades. The
slave revolts, the occasional resorts to violence in recent times, the
costly fifty-year struggle that the National Association for the
Advancement of Colored People has carried on in the courts, the
thousands arrested throughout the South since the Montgomery bus
boycott — all reveal an historic impatience and a thirst
for freedom. What is new springs from the white resistance in
Birmingham, with its fire hoses, its dogs, its blatant disregard for
black men as people, and from the Afro-American's response to such
treatment in "the year of our Lord" 1963.
For the black people of this nation, Birmingham became the moment of
truth. The struggle from now on will be fought in a different context.
Therefore, to understand the mood, tactics and totality of the black
people's relentless war on Jim Crow, we must grasp fully what is taking
place in this Southern industrial city.
For the first time, every black man, woman and child, regardless of
station, has been brought into the struggle. Unlike the period of the
Montgomery boycott, when die Southern Christian Leadership Conference
had to be organized to stimulate similar action elsewhere, the response
to Birmingham has been immediate and spontaneous. City after city has
come into the fight, from Jackson, Mississippi, to Chesterton, Maryland.
The militancy has spread to Philadelphia, where the "city fathers" and
the trade-union movement have been forced to make reluctant concessions.
It has reached the old and established freedom organizations. For
example, Roy Wilkins, executive secretary of the N.A.A.C.P., who only a
year ago, from a platform in Jackson, Mississippi, criticized the
direct-action methods of the Freedom Riders, was arrested recently for
leading a picket line in that very city, after hundreds of N.A.A.C.P.
members had been arrested in a direct action struggle.
Before Birmingham, the great struggles had been waged for specific,
limited goals. The Freedom Rides sought to establish the right to eat
while traveling; the sit-ins sought to win the right to eat in local
restaurants; the Meredith case centered on a single Negro's right to
enter a state university. The Montgomery boycott, although it involved
fifty thousand people in a year long sacrificial struggle, was limited
to attaining the right to ride the city buses with dignity and respect.
The black people now reject token, limited or gradual approaches.
The package deal is the new demand. The black community is not prepared
to engage in a series of costly battles — first for
jobs, then decent housing, then integrated schools, etc., etc. The fact
that there is a power elite which makes the decisions is now clearly
understood. The Negro has learned that, through economic and mass
pressures, this elite can be made to submit step by step. Now he demands
unconditional surrender.
It is significant that in city after city where the spirit of Birmingham
has spread, the Negroes are demanding fundamental social, political and
economic changes. One can predict with confidence that in the future the
scope of these demands will be widened, not narrowed, and that if they
are not met in the North as well as in the South, a very dangerous
situation will develop. Federal troops may well become a familiar sight
in the North as well as the South, since the black community is
determined to move vigorously and fearlessly arid relentlessly ahead.
Absence of Fear
Gandhi used to say that the absence of fear was the prime ingredient of
nonviolence: "To be afraid is to be a slave." A. J. Muste frequently
says that to be afraid is to behave as if the truth were not true. It
was the loss of all fear that produced the moment of truth in
Birmingham: children as young as six paraded calmly when dogs, fire
hoses and police billies were used against them. Women were knocked down
to the ground and beaten mercilessly. Thousands of teenagers stood by at
churches throughout the whole county, waiting their turn to face the
clubs of Bull Connor's police, who are known to be among the most brutal
in the nation. Property was bombed. Day after day the brutality and
arrests went on. And always, in the churches, hundreds of well-
disciplined children eagerly awaited their turns.
While these youngsters, unlike Meredith, had the advantage 0# operating
in groups, and while Meredith's ordeal must have been the most difficult
borne by any freedom fighter short of death — the
children of Birmingham, like no other person or group, inspired and
shamed all Afro-Americans, and pulled them into a united struggle.
E. Franklin Frazier wrote in the past of the Negro bourgeoisie. He told
of the efforts of the Negro upper classes to ape. white people, of the
exploitation of Negroes by wealthy members of their own race and of the
absence of' identity among Negroes. But had Frazier been alive to see
Birmingham he would have discovered that the black community was welded
into a classless revolt. A. G. Gaston, the Negro millionaire who with
some ministers and other upper-class elements had publicly stated that
the time was not,ripe for such a broad protest, finally accommodated
himself, as did the others, to the mass pressure from below and joined
the struggle. Gaston owns much property, including a funeral parlor and
the motel that eventually became the headquarters for the Birmingham
campaign. The bombing of his motel was one cause of t4e outbreak of
rioting on the part of elements that had not come, into the nonviolent
struggle.
On the basis of the behavior of the black business community in the
cities where protests have emerged since Birmingham, one can confidently
predict that future struggle will find the Negro bourgeoisie playing a
majpr role in social change and nonviolence. They know that unless they
join in the struggle they will lose the business of their fellow
Negroes, who are in no mood to tolerate Uncle Tom-ism.
Black people have waited a hundred years for the government to help them
win their rights. President after President has made commitments before
election and failed to use the executive power he possesses after
election. Congress today, dominated by Southern Democrats, cannot pass
any meaningful civil-rights legislation. The Supreme Court, from 1954 to
1963, took a gradualist approach, thereby putting its stamp of approval
on "with all deliberate speed," which spells tokenism.
So the black people have looked elsewhere for allies, hoping to discover
some major power group within American society which would join them not
only in the struggle for Negro rights, but also in the struggle for a
more democratic America. The trade-union movement and the churches have
issued radical pronouncements but in fact have done precious little and
on occasion have even blocked progress. Thus the black population has
concluded that the future lies in casting not just a ballot, what
Thoreau called "a piece of paper merely," but the total
vote — the human person against injustice.
This is not to say that black people are not deeply appreciative of
those few independent radicals, liberals and church people who have
offered time, money and even their lives. They have nothing but
admiration for people like Jim Peck, who was brutally beaten in
Mississippi and Alabama during the Freedom Rides, Barbara Deming, who
was arrested in Birmingham, Eric Weinberger, who fasted for a month in
Alabama jails, and William Moore, the slain postman. One can be thankful
that the number of such individuals is increasing. However,
social change of such magnitude requires that major power groups in our
society participate as meaningful allies.
Body Against Injustice
The use of the "black body" against injustice is necessary as a means of
creating social disruption and dislocation precisely because the
accepted democratic channels have been denied the Negro.
In practice, it works like this: having urged the social institutions to
desegregate to no avail, having pleaded for justice to no avail, the
black people see that the white community would rather yield to the
threats of the segregationist (in the name of law and order) than change
the social system. And so Negroes conclude that they must upset the
social equilibrium more drastically than the opposition can. They place
their bodies against an unjust law by sitting in a restaurant, or a
library, playing in a park or swimming in a pool. The segregationists,
frequently joined by the police, attack. Arrests and brutality follow.
But the black people keep coming, wave after wave. The jails fill. The
black population boycotts the stores. Businesses begin to lose money.
At this point the white community splits into two groups. On one side
are the political and law-enforcement agencies, supported by the arch-
segregationists, who fearfully resort to indiscriminate violence as a
stop-gap measure. Then the more enlightened section of the community,
including many business leaders, begin to act for the first time. They
sense not on!y the rightness of the Negroes' demands but their
inevitability. They realize that police violence may bring both a
violent response from unorganized elements of the black population and
increased economic reprisals. Thus the business community, previously
having sided with the forces of reaction, at first quietly and then
openly sue for discussion and negotiation with the Negro community, an
approach they had earlier dismissed when it was proposed by Negro
leaders.
This method of massive nonviolence has many dangers. The greatest threat
is that violence, which has been smoldering beneath the surface for
generations, will inevitably manifest itself. But the creative genius of
people in action is the only safeguard in this period and it can be
trusted to bring about, ultimately, a better community, precisely
because the tactic of mass action is accompanied by nonviolent
resistance. The protesters pledge themselves to refrain from violence in
word and deed, thereby confining whatever inevitable violence there may
be in the situation to an irreducible minimum.
The genius of this method and philosophy lies in its ability to destroy
an old unjust institution and simultaneously create a new one. For
finally the white community is forced to choose between closing down the
schools, restaurants, parks, buses, etc., and integrating them. Faced
for the first time with a choice that can impose discomfort,
inconvenience and economic turmoil in the white
community — that community discovers that it would
prefer integrated institutions to no public institutions at all.
It is therefore clear that we can now expect, following Birmingham, a
more sympathetic ear from the power structure, in both the North and the
South.
Financial Tenderness of Segregation
Loss of money to retail stores throughout the country, the reluctance of
many industries to move to Little Rock during the school integration
struggle, the fear of capitalists to invest in Mississippi and Alabama
now, and the disrupting of the economy in Birmingham have caused big
businesses, including steel, to take a second look at the "Negro
problem."
The nation gives Robert Kennedy credit for the fact that the real rulers
of Birmingham sat down with representatives of the black revolution. But
knowledgeable people realize that it was the withdrawal of black
purchasing power in a city which is almost half black, and the militant,
unconditional surrender policies of the nonviolent struggle that turned
the tide.
Again, Birmingham is a turning point in that all significant elements of
the power structure have now acknowledged that the white community must
recognize the true nature of the black revolution and its economic
consequences.
Therefore, in city after city, following Birmingham, the real powers
have moved to convince the politicians that they should negotiate. Chain
store, moving picture, hotel and restaurant executives have recently
sought out representatives of the black community to ask for
negotiations leading to nation-wide desegregation. This is new. It is a
consequence of the handwriting they see on the wall. They see it in
police brutality and the bombed-out homes and business establishments.
They see it in the eyes of Birmingham's children.
The tragedy is that the trade-union movement, the churches and
educational institutions which lay claim to freedom and justice, reveal
that they have learned nothing from the Battle of Birmingham. This is
especially sad since the great battle lies ahead. And this battle the
black population is now prepared to wage. This is going to he the battle
for jobs. "
Negroes are finally beginning to realize that the age of automation and
industrialization presents them with peculiar problems. There is less
and less of a market where the unskilled can sell his labor. Inadequate,
segregated schools increase the problem. The negative attitude of the
trade unions compounds it further. The Cold War economy, geared to
armaments production (perhaps the most automated of all industries) is
throwing millions out of work, hut the minority groups are being hit
hardest. For every white person unemployed, there are close to three
Negroes without jobs.
In general, the unemployed, whether white or black, are not yet prepared
to take radical action to demand jobs now. However, unemployed black
people are prepared to move in conjunction with the rest of the black
community and its many white supporters, within the context of the broad
civil.rights upheaval. Since their most immediate ends are economic,
their banner will he "Dignity of work with equal pay and equal
opportunity." This agitation on the part of Negroes for jobs is hound to
stimulate unemployed white workers to increased militancy. There will be
sit-downs and other dislocating tactics. Nonviolent resistance will have
to be directed against local and federal governments, the labor unions,
against the A.F .L..C.I.O. hierarchy and any construction plant or
industry that refuses to grant jobs. Such mass disturbances will
probably soon take place in the major industrial centers of the country
and it is likely that they will be more vigorous in the North than they
have been in the South. And they will have incalculable effects on the
economic structure.
The great lesson of Birmingham is at once dangerous and creative; black
people have moved to that level where they cannot be contained. They are
not prepared to wait for courts, elections, votes, government officials,
or even Negro leaders. As James Baldwin said in an interview published
in the New York Times for June 3rd: "No man can claim to speak
for the Negro people today. There is no one with whom the power
structure can negotiate a deal that will bind Negro people. There is,
therefore, no possibility of a bargain." The black people
themselves are united and determined to destroy an unjust laws
and discriminatory practices, and they want total freedom, including
equal economic opportunity and the right to marry whom they damned well
please. They know that at a time when the Kennedy brothers were fighting
hard to maintain an aura of leaderhip and control of the civil-rights
movement, the children of Birmingham, using methods of nonviolent
resistance, restored the leadership to the black community. This was, as
reported in the June 6th issue of Jet, a "terrible licking" for
the federal government. If kids can revitalize the civil rights
movement in Birmingham, the least we can do is to act like men and women
and fight now to provide them with a decent future.
The mood is one of anger and confidence of total victory. The victories
to date have given added prestige to the method of nonviolent
resistance. One can only hope that the white community win realize that
the black community means what it says: freedom now.
Copyright © Bayard Rustin, 1963.
|